<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prop 8 witnesses debate scholarship on families</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.keennewsservice.com/2010/01/30/prop-8-witnesses-debate-scholarship-on-families/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.keennewsservice.com/2010/01/30/prop-8-witnesses-debate-scholarship-on-families/</link>
	<description>National LGBT news by experienced gay reporters covering law and politics with a deeper understanding than mainstream news wires.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:56:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mombian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Now I Know Who All These People Running Around My House Are</title>
		<link>http://www.keennewsservice.com/2010/01/30/prop-8-witnesses-debate-scholarship-on-families/comment-page-1/#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>Mombian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Now I Know Who All These People Running Around My House Are</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keennewsservice.com/?p=788#comment-1298</guid>
		<description>[...] that he didn&#8217;t use the &#8220;one man-one woman&#8221; definition. Combine this with his statement during the Prop 8 trial that “I believe that adopting same-sex marriage would be likely to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that he didn&#8217;t use the &#8220;one man-one woman&#8221; definition. Combine this with his statement during the Prop 8 trial that “I believe that adopting same-sex marriage would be likely to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mombian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Prop 8 Case and Kids: Says Who?</title>
		<link>http://www.keennewsservice.com/2010/01/30/prop-8-witnesses-debate-scholarship-on-families/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Mombian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Prop 8 Case and Kids: Says Who?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keennewsservice.com/?p=788#comment-110</guid>
		<description>[...] I explore these quotes and some of the differences between the two witnesses in a piece over at Keen News Service.    via Twitter, Facebook, Digg, e-mail, and more   10:04 am  Politics and Law &#171; Weekly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I explore these quotes and some of the differences between the two witnesses in a piece over at Keen News Service.    via Twitter, Facebook, Digg, e-mail, and more   10:04 am  Politics and Law &laquo; Weekly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlexSF</title>
		<link>http://www.keennewsservice.com/2010/01/30/prop-8-witnesses-debate-scholarship-on-families/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>FlexSF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keennewsservice.com/?p=788#comment-105</guid>
		<description>The religious defenders of proposition 8 ... should be prosecuted for the rampant ignorance that they&#039;ve codified into law. In light of all of these facts, they continue to blindly follow the rampant homophobic teachings of their religious corporate leaders without question. 

If proposition 8 is upheld, the legal explanation will need to be extraordinary to contradict the facts that have been illuminated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The religious defenders of proposition 8 &#8230; should be prosecuted for the rampant ignorance that they&#8217;ve codified into law. In light of all of these facts, they continue to blindly follow the rampant homophobic teachings of their religious corporate leaders without question. </p>
<p>If proposition 8 is upheld, the legal explanation will need to be extraordinary to contradict the facts that have been illuminated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

