ad_email
ad_email_468

2 responses to “No on Prop 8 groups lose a round”

  1. John

    Not a very enlightening report. (1) On what legal basis does the court contend that persons not part of the lawsuit must turn over documents and (2) if those documents are already in possession of parties to the lawsuit then why are THEY not made to disclose as opposed to ACLU and EQCA.

    That said EQCA’s ability to even muster sufficient signatures to repeal Prop 8 put the final nail on its coffin. It is a totally ineffective public relations group that has caused a great deal of harm. How did we get here in the first place?

    First, because EQCA, boasting of millions of dollars in its coffers and thousands of foot soldiers was utterly asleep at the switch and busy preaching to the choir in the Castro and not getting out and talking the fight to our adversaries.

    Second it engaged in inconsistent pleading to the public. On the one hand it went door to door asking people to repeal Prop 8 (you get to vote on it) but on the other hand it worked to overturn Prop 8 on the grounds of it being unconstitutional (you don’t get to vote on it). People, especially educated people, see through that deceit and resent us for it.

    Third, EQCA was adamantly against this trial and ran in fear of the only and best legal solution – the federal court! It was only after they realized EQCA would look pretty foolish of we won the trial that it flip-flopped and decided to get behind it.

    Fourth, when so-called activists began adopting our adversaries’ arguments (states’ rights) and dignified that specious argument they conceded precious ground.

    Finally, by utterly lacking the courage to take the fight where it belongs (to the steps of the churches that trash the First Amendment), EQCA has so discredited itself that it no longer deserves the support of this community. It has failed repeatedly and miserably in every regard.

    EQCA has become more a liability than an asset and if the community continues to entrust it with our dollars well all be shipped off in a gay Jim Crow railroad car. I can see why it might regard its communications as an embarrassment to remain hidden.

  2. Erik R. Soto Photography

    Challenge Judge Walker’s order by sending him your picture of you and your partner on Friday, April 16. Show your solidarity! We shall overcome!

Leave a Reply

A Closer Look

Loud clash over same-sex marriage: Where personal and political meetLoud clash over same-sex marriage: Where personal and political meet

It has been a dizzying week for same-sex marriage.

Consider this: The front cover of Newsweek magazine on Monday (May 14) carried a photograph of President Obama with the caption “The First Gay President.” The president appeared on a nationally televised group talk show to discuss his position. Republican presidential nominee-apparent Mitt Romney reiterated his opposition to allowing gays to marry at a speech before Jerry Falwell’s university. The Washington Post ran a well-sourced story reporting that, in high school, Romney had led an assault on a fellow student that many believed to be gay.

» more


Breaking News

White House threatens veto as House omits LGBTs in two billsWhite House threatens veto as House omits LGBTs in two bills

Despite a warning that President Obama may exercise his veto power, the U.S. House Wednesday (May 16) approved a version of the Violence Against Women Act that omits provisions, approved in the Senate, to help LGBT victims of domestic violence.

» more


House GOP shoot down effort to insert LGBT protections in VAWAHouse GOP shoot down effort to insert LGBT protections in VAWA

In a strict party line vote, Republicans on the U.S. House Judiciary Committee rejected three attempts Tuesday (May 7) to add protections for LGBT victims of domestic abuse in a bill to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act.

» more


Obama: ‘I think same-sex couples should be able to marry’Obama: ‘I think same-sex couples should be able to marry’

President Obama said in a White House-arranged interview Wednesday afternoon that “same-sex couples should be able to get married.”

» more


NC approves constitutional ban: 61 to 39NC approves constitutional ban: 61 to 39

For those in the LGBT community who have watched state after state pass constitutional amendments to ban same-sex marriage, the results in North Carolina were expected: Voters approved the ban by a margin of roughly 61 percent to 39 percent, as of late Tuesday night.

» more


Iowa justices explain why they didn’t campaign to retain seatsIowa justices explain why they didn’t campaign to retain seats

BOSTON—Three Iowa state supreme court justices ousted by voters in 2010 for ruling that same-sex couples were due the same rights as other couples under the state constitution were honored May 7 with the prestigious JFK Profiles in Courage Award.

» more