ad_facebook
ad_email_468

3 responses to “Chief Justice: Why should all pay for what only some need?”

  1. Duane Williams

    This whole debate seems crazy to me. The government has the power to raise taxes without having to say what the money is going to be spent on. Why couldn’t the government declare that all citizens are eligible to enroll in Medicare and then raise taxes as needed to pay for it? At the same time the government could require that all doctors and hospitals accept Medicare insurance. People who already have health care insurance would not be required to switch to Medicare, but they would still have to pay their taxes.

  2. Duane Williams

    I didn’t need the war in Iraq. Is the Chief Justice trying to say that I should’t have to pay for it? Can I get a tax refund?

  3. David Lampo

    Duane, that’s a strange and invalid analogy. Individuals don’t purchase wars; they do purchase health insurance, and up until ACA, they had a choice in doing so, as well as in the scope of coverage. Now we’re loaded down with mandates to purchase coverage we don’t need. That’s wrong. Why do liberals always promote choice when it comes to abortion and contraception and gay rights (correctly, I might add) but oppose choice in so many other areas of life? They have no moral standing to talk about gay rights when at the same time they say you can’t choose your health care, your retirement plans, what you spend 30 percent or more of your income on, etc.

Leave a Reply

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

A Closer Look

First GOP debates: 17 candidates, one ‘humane’ response on LGBT issues

Only six of the 17 Republican presidential candidates fielded a question that hit upon an LGBT issue during last Thursday’s debates. And only one of those six –Ohio Governor John Kasich— answered in a way that suggested a measure of respect for LGBT people.

» more


Breaking News

Supreme Court denies stay in Kentucky clerk bid to refuse marriage licenses

In a significant blow to those who seek to use a free exercise of religion argument to discriminate against same-sex couples seeking to marry, U.S. Supreme Court on Monday evening denied an emergency request to stop enforcement of a federal district court order that a Kentucky county clerk resume issuing marriage licenses.

» more


Cruz says gay florist should be able to refuse service to evangelical

Republican presidential hopeful told a gathering last Friday that a gay florist should be able to refuse service to an evangelical couple if the florist disagrees with the couple’s faith.

» more


Religion v. equal protection showdown reaches 6th Circuit

An important showdown between the constitutional rights to religious freedom and equal protection reached a federal appeals court Tuesday (August 18). A county clerk in Kentucky filed an appeal to the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in hopes of securing the right to refuse marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

» more


Kasich gets a small boost, but debate does little to change GOP standings

Republican presidential candidates’ responses on LGBT questions during the August 6 debate appear to have had very little impact on the candidates’ overall standings in the polls. Ohio Governor John Kasich, who won some positive commentary for his remark that he’d love his daughter even if she was gay (that wasn’t the question), picked up […]

» more


EEOC decision gives concrete remedies for federal employees facing bias

A U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission decision Thursday could provide important remedies to thousands of federal workers who might face sexual orientation discrimination and may increase pressure on Congress to advance the ENDA.

» more