ad_email
ad_email_468

4 responses to “Rosen in the hot seat over barb against Romney’s attitude toward women”

  1. rob s

    everyone knows exactly what she meant, the Obama team’s response is ridiculous. People in the upper reaches of wealth like the Romneys don’t have normal household needs, they’ll have servants who earn more than most people. I wish Rosen had held her tongue and not apologized.

  2. Adele Haas

    Hilary’s only meaning was true. Mrs Romney has
    Not felt the anguish of trying to feed and house a family with children.
    We women are being attacked by the republicans
    For existing,having a body, and having a mind of
    Our own.

    I am disgusted with the democratic party for
    Denouncing Hilary and can promise you that
    Should her statement cause her to be let go from
    Any position I will rally against those that cause it.

  3. Marc Paige

    Rosen did the right thing to apologize. To imply that raising children is not work is a stupid and wrong message. But it is also sad, and oh-so predictable, to see the right-wing Republican attack machine demean Hillary Rosen because she is gay.

  4. Ron B

    Obama seems to let me down more and more…….

Leave a Reply

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

A Closer Look

Initial snapshots of GOP candidates on LGBT issues: ‘Confuse everybody’

Studies have shown that only about one-third of LGBT Americans vote Republican, but there’s realistic chance a Republican will win the White House in 2016, so LGBT people need to pay attention to who might take the GOP nomination. The first debates among Republican presidential candidates hoping to win that nomination take place this week: […]

» more


Breaking News

EEOC decision gives concrete remedies for federal employees facing bias

A U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission decision Thursday could provide important remedies to thousands of federal workers who might face sexual orientation discrimination and may increase pressure on Congress to advance the ENDA.

» more


“Justice that arrives like a thunderbolt”: On same-sex marriage “the fight is over”

June 26 has been solidified as the historic date for LGBT history in the United States. It is the day in 2003 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states could not enforce laws prohibiting same-sex adults from having intimate relations. It is the day in 2013 when a Supreme Court procedural ruling enabled same-sex couples to marry […]

» more


Supreme Court: States must license and recognize licenses of marriages for same-sex couples

In a widely expected yet stunning victory for LGBT people nationally, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today (June 26) that state bans on marriage for same-sex couples are unconstitutional. The decision requires states to both issue marriage licenses to couples and to recognize marriage licenses obtained in other states by same-sex couples.

» more


Supreme Court upholds health insurance subsidies critical to people with HIV

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6 to 3 decision, upheld the right of the federal government to provide health care insurance subsidies to people with low income in states that have chosen not to participate in the Affordable Care Act by setting up insurance “exchanges.”

The decision, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, is a big political victory for the Obama administration and a big relief for people with low incomes, including many people with HIV.

» more


Abercrombie case: LGBT and evangelicals on the same side

It is a rare occasion when LGBT legal activists find themselves on the same side of a case as the conservative Christian Legal Society and the National Association of Evangelicals. It is also rare to find LGBT legal activists on the same side as conservative Justice Antonin Scalia and his fondness for hewing to the original explicit language of a law.

But so it was with EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch June 1, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an employer cannot escape federal law’s requirement to accommodate a job applicant’s religious practices by claiming the applicant never told the employer about his or her religious practices.

» more