ad_facebook_468

2 responses to “No on Prop 8 groups lose a round”

  1. John

    Not a very enlightening report. (1) On what legal basis does the court contend that persons not part of the lawsuit must turn over documents and (2) if those documents are already in possession of parties to the lawsuit then why are THEY not made to disclose as opposed to ACLU and EQCA.

    That said EQCA’s ability to even muster sufficient signatures to repeal Prop 8 put the final nail on its coffin. It is a totally ineffective public relations group that has caused a great deal of harm. How did we get here in the first place?

    First, because EQCA, boasting of millions of dollars in its coffers and thousands of foot soldiers was utterly asleep at the switch and busy preaching to the choir in the Castro and not getting out and talking the fight to our adversaries.

    Second it engaged in inconsistent pleading to the public. On the one hand it went door to door asking people to repeal Prop 8 (you get to vote on it) but on the other hand it worked to overturn Prop 8 on the grounds of it being unconstitutional (you don’t get to vote on it). People, especially educated people, see through that deceit and resent us for it.

    Third, EQCA was adamantly against this trial and ran in fear of the only and best legal solution – the federal court! It was only after they realized EQCA would look pretty foolish of we won the trial that it flip-flopped and decided to get behind it.

    Fourth, when so-called activists began adopting our adversaries’ arguments (states’ rights) and dignified that specious argument they conceded precious ground.

    Finally, by utterly lacking the courage to take the fight where it belongs (to the steps of the churches that trash the First Amendment), EQCA has so discredited itself that it no longer deserves the support of this community. It has failed repeatedly and miserably in every regard.

    EQCA has become more a liability than an asset and if the community continues to entrust it with our dollars well all be shipped off in a gay Jim Crow railroad car. I can see why it might regard its communications as an embarrassment to remain hidden.

  2. Erik R. Soto Photography

    Challenge Judge Walker’s order by sending him your picture of you and your partner on Friday, April 16. Show your solidarity! We shall overcome!

Leave a Reply

A Closer Look

Marriage equality: A busy 2012 is off and running

Pro-active efforts got underway this month to establish marriage equality in at least three more states. After a 2011 that saw marriage equality become reality in the most populous state yet and the Obama administration issuing a major statement against the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 2012 could do even better.

» more


Breaking News

Children with LGB parents: youthful perspectives on marriageChildren with LGB parents: youthful perspectives on marriage

A first-ever study of how teens and young adults with LGB parents feel about marriage equality was published this month in the peer-reviewed Journal of Marriage and Family.

» more


Federal appeals panel rules Prop 8 videos stay under sealFederal appeals panel rules Prop 8 videos stay under seal

Most gay legal activists issued a subtle yawn in reaction to the 22-page decision Thursday by a federal appeals panel to keep the Proposition 8 trial videotapes under seal.

» more


GOP gays and Florida back RomneyGOP gays and Florida back Romney

R. Clarke Cooper, head of the national Log Cabin Republicans group, said Mitt Romney won an “informal vote” among the leaders of Florida’s three chapters on the Saturday before Tuesday’s primary. And voters in Florida’s Republican primary on Tuesday gave Romney a victory, too, albeit a less resounding one than did Log Cabin Florida leaders. [...]

» more


New HUD rule called ‘truly historic’New HUD rule called ‘truly historic’

In a speech before a national LGBT conference on Saturday (January 28), U.S. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan said President Obama views the fight for LGBT equality “not as an issue, but as a priority.”

» more


Religious bias cases at high courtReligious bias cases at high court

The battle lines between the constitutional right to free exercise of religion and laws prohibiting discrimination are seeing some action at the U.S. Supreme Court these days.

» more