ad_email
ad_facebook_468

6 responses to “Movement to ban gay adoption: sacrificing the well-being of children”

  1. Bill

    Heartbreaking. That heterosexuals would sooner see their ‘throwaway children’ ACTUALLY thrown away rather than live with a gay couple.

    Morality indeed, straight folks.

    Morality indeed.

  2. RE Bill

    Bill, I think it would be far more appropriate to say “That HOMOPHOBES would sooner…” rather than what you did say… I am a heterosexual, and I believe that any couple, traditional or otherwise, capable of caring for a child in a nurturing and loving environment should be able to do so. Addressing this to “straight folks” only makes you look ignorant.

  3. electrakitty

    I have zero issue with states saying that someone is not a good enough parent and barring him/her from adopting. Though I hate it, I could even accept (for now) that state saying that one is not a good enough parent because he/she is gay. But that’s not what these states are saying. They’re saying “You’re good parents. We’re just not going to legitimize your families.” And that’s not ok.

  4. Mombian » Blog Archive » New Study: Children of Same-Sex Parents Make Normal School Progress

    [...] At which point I refer you to my piece on the pending adoption decision in Florida. [...]

  5. Mombian » Blog Archive » LGBT Parenting Roundup

    [...] Lesbian moms Vanessa Alenier and Melanie Leon spoke before the Florida Third District Court of Appeal, fighting to preserve Alenier’s adoption of her young nephew. The Department of Children and Families has requested the adoption be overturned because of the state law that prevents any lesbian or gay man from adopting. In January, a Miami-Dade circuit judge allowed the adoption, saying the ban was “unconstitutional on its face.” The more well known Florida adoption case of Frank Martin Gill was heard by the same court last August, and a ruling is still pending. [...]

  6. Mombian » Blog Archive » Florida Adoption Ban Struck Down

    [...] background on the case and its implications for adoption rights across the country, see my Keen News piece from July. via Twitter, Facebook, Digg, e-mail, and more 5:09 pm Politics and Law « [...]

Leave a Reply

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

A Closer Look

June 26: An historic date marking victories that almost didn’t happenJune 26: An historic date marking victories that almost didn’t happen

Three important U.S. Supreme Court decisions have made June 26 the most historic date on the LGBT civil rights movement’s calendar. But the powerful impact of two of those decisions has almost obscured the fact that they were narrow victories.

» more


Breaking News

Fourth Circuit panel votes 2 to 1 to strike Virginia’s same-sex marriage ban

It was clear from the oral argument that two out of three of the judges on a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel would vote on opposite sides concerning the constitutionality of Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage. The question was how the third judge would vote. That question was answered Monday: He voted against the ban.

» more


President signs historic executive order

President Obama this morning (July 21) signed a long-sought executive order prohibiting contractors who do business with the federal government from discriminating based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and adding to existing protection (which includes sexual orientation) for federal employees a prohibition of discrimination based on gender identity.

» more


Legal activists call Hobby Lobby decision ‘radical’ and will require vigilance to protect LGBT equality

Some LGBT legal activists say today’s decision in a U.S. Supreme Court religious exemption case amounts to a “dangerous and radical departure from existing law that creates far more questions than it answers.”

Saying it is not providing a “shield for employers who might cloak illegal discrimination as a religious practice,” a 5 to 4 majority of the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today (June 30) that a federal law may not require a closely held commercial employer to provide health insurance coverage for contraception if that employer claims that to do so violates his or her personal religious beliefs.

» more


First federal appeals court panel weighs in; finds Utah’s ban unconstitutionalFirst federal appeals court panel weighs in; finds Utah’s ban unconstitutional

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a 2 to 1 decision Wednesday, upholding a district court decision that Utah’s ban on marriage for same-sex couples is unconstitutional.

» more


June 26: An historic date marking victories that almost didn’t happenJune 26: An historic date marking victories that almost didn’t happen

Three important U.S. Supreme Court decisions have made June 26 the most historic date on the LGBT civil rights movement’s calendar. But the powerful impact of two of those decisions has almost obscured the fact that they were narrow victories.

» more