ad_email
ad_email_468

2 responses to “Two groups send mixed message on DADT repeal timing”

  1. Mariah Colette, FL.

    I find it apalling how a man who speaks of equal rights for america, has the nerve to down the LGBT society. Are they not equal to that of any heterosexual being. Also, men and women are allowed to serve in the army together, so why is it that homosexuals can not serve in the armed forces with their significant other. All that matters is the fact that they are fighting for the freedom of America. It should not depend what their sexuality is. John McCain is arrogant in that he wishes to deny patriotic americans to serve their country due to thier sexuality. – mariah colette lbhs high school

  2. Karl Streips (Riga, Latvia)

    I have lived in Europe now for 20 years and am just appalled at what is happening in American politics, but in this particular case, specifically about John McCain. What is this man’s problem? First he said he wanted the military’s leaders to speak out. They did — in favor of repeal. Then he said that the views of the military leaders needed to be studied in greater detail. They were — in favor of repeal. Then he said that he wanted to know what service members think. They said yes to repeal. Now he’s saying that this, too, needs to be studied in greater detail. What’s to study, Senator? You’re in the minority. You won another six years in the Senate in November — why are you being such a jerk about this? It’s bad enough that you ruined your reputation by foisting Sarah Palin on America. Do you really need to ruin it further by claiming that the concept of equal protection in the United States Constitution actually does not apply equally to everyone? For shame, Senator! For eternal and damning shame!

Leave a Reply

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

A Closer Look

First GOP debates: 17 candidates, one ‘humane’ response on LGBT issues

Only six of the 17 Republican presidential candidates fielded a question that hit upon an LGBT issue during last Thursday’s debates. And only one of those six –Ohio Governor John Kasich— answered in a way that suggested a measure of respect for LGBT people.

» more


Breaking News

Supreme Court denies stay in Kentucky clerk bid to refuse marriage licenses

In a significant blow to those who seek to use a free exercise of religion argument to discriminate against same-sex couples seeking to marry, U.S. Supreme Court on Monday evening denied an emergency request to stop enforcement of a federal district court order that a Kentucky county clerk resume issuing marriage licenses.

» more


Cruz says gay florist should be able to refuse service to evangelical

Republican presidential hopeful told a gathering last Friday that a gay florist should be able to refuse service to an evangelical couple if the florist disagrees with the couple’s faith.

» more


Religion v. equal protection showdown reaches 6th Circuit

An important showdown between the constitutional rights to religious freedom and equal protection reached a federal appeals court Tuesday (August 18). A county clerk in Kentucky filed an appeal to the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in hopes of securing the right to refuse marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

» more


Kasich gets a small boost, but debate does little to change GOP standings

Republican presidential candidates’ responses on LGBT questions during the August 6 debate appear to have had very little impact on the candidates’ overall standings in the polls. Ohio Governor John Kasich, who won some positive commentary for his remark that he’d love his daughter even if she was gay (that wasn’t the question), picked up […]

» more


EEOC decision gives concrete remedies for federal employees facing bias

A U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission decision Thursday could provide important remedies to thousands of federal workers who might face sexual orientation discrimination and may increase pressure on Congress to advance the ENDA.

» more