ad_facebook
ad_email_468

2 responses to “Two groups send mixed message on DADT repeal timing”

  1. Mariah Colette, FL.

    I find it apalling how a man who speaks of equal rights for america, has the nerve to down the LGBT society. Are they not equal to that of any heterosexual being. Also, men and women are allowed to serve in the army together, so why is it that homosexuals can not serve in the armed forces with their significant other. All that matters is the fact that they are fighting for the freedom of America. It should not depend what their sexuality is. John McCain is arrogant in that he wishes to deny patriotic americans to serve their country due to thier sexuality. – mariah colette lbhs high school

  2. Karl Streips (Riga, Latvia)

    I have lived in Europe now for 20 years and am just appalled at what is happening in American politics, but in this particular case, specifically about John McCain. What is this man’s problem? First he said he wanted the military’s leaders to speak out. They did — in favor of repeal. Then he said that the views of the military leaders needed to be studied in greater detail. They were — in favor of repeal. Then he said that he wanted to know what service members think. They said yes to repeal. Now he’s saying that this, too, needs to be studied in greater detail. What’s to study, Senator? You’re in the minority. You won another six years in the Senate in November — why are you being such a jerk about this? It’s bad enough that you ruined your reputation by foisting Sarah Palin on America. Do you really need to ruin it further by claiming that the concept of equal protection in the United States Constitution actually does not apply equally to everyone? For shame, Senator! For eternal and damning shame!

Leave a Reply

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

A Closer Look

Key mid-term race to watch is the Kentucky senate, where prospects for ENDA could hinge on McConnell

Most of the pundits are saying Republicans will take over the U.S. Senate and keep the House in the November 4 elections. If they’re right –and there is some room for doubt—the Employment Non-Discrimination Act will likely have to undergo a complete makeover.

» more


Breaking News

Michaud gets major boost from Obama and a surprise move by an opponent

Media attention on Maine’s gubernatorial race was split Thursday between President Obama’s rally for U.S. Rep. Mike Michaud’s bid to become the first openly gay person elected governor of any state and the shake-out over pro-gay third party opponent Eliot Cutler’s announcement that his supporters should feel free to vote for someone else.

» more


Next month’s elections may be one for the history books for LGBT candidates

This year’s election night is likely to be an important one for the LGBT history books: Voters in Massachusetts are expected to elect the nation’s first-ever openly gay state attorney general, and voters in Maine could very well elect the nation’s first-ever openly gay governor. Here are 10 races to watch November 4.

» more


Polis tries parliamentary maneuver in hopes of moving ENDA to the floor

Because House Speaker John Boehner has vowed to block ENDA from getting a vote, the discharge petition has become the only hope to force ENDA to the floor if the Republican-dominated chamber. U.S. Rep. Jared Polis, with the backing of Democratic House leaders, filed a petition with the House clerk. It’s a long-shot but ENDA supporters need to find just 16 signatures to get the ball rolling.

» more


Sixth Circuit GOP judges: Why not let the voters decide who gets to marry?

The three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals seemed to signal pretty clearly where they’re headed on the six marriage equality lawsuits they heard arguments in Wednesday: toward the first federal appeals ruling to undo lower court rulings that held state bans on marriage for same-sex couples to be unconstitutional.

» more


Fourth Circuit panel votes 2 to 1 to strike Virginia’s same-sex marriage ban

It was clear from the oral argument that two out of three of the judges on a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel would vote on opposite sides concerning the constitutionality of Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage. The question was how the third judge would vote. That question was answered Monday: He voted against the ban.

» more