ad_email
ad_email_468

5 responses to “Gay vote 2010: Questions loom for 2012”

  1. antonio

    There was a film entitled “Ship of Fools”
    The film dealt with how the targets of a final solution considered such a plan so horrific and unbelievable, they found DENIAL was the most rational response.
    Uganda is a good example of where government goes when fundamental religion becomes the power–a final solution concerning sexual outsiders.
    Most Muslim countries already implement the solution.

    Fat, happy, comfortable, LGB who continue to support current Republicanism, must be filled with internalized homophobia, racism and elitism. I don’t want to be on their ship. It’s one of the reasons I self identify as Queer–i’m an outsider and decline to have any part of the self indulgent aspects of “gay” life or the sour bitterness of current republicanism.
    antonio

  2. MassM22

    the Massachusetts Data does not take into effect the Republicans running for Governor and Lt Governor are fairly liberal when it comes to LGBT rights, the Candidate for Lt Governor himself is openly gay and is the Senate Minority leader. Despite their positions on issues close to me, and the great lengths that Senator Tisei went to keep marriage rights off the ballot in 2008, I cant vote republican because I feel it would be saying to the RNC “It’s totally ok to [treat] minorities, gays and immigrants [badly] because it doesn’t matter, [they] will still vote for us!’

    I cant send that message to the rest of the US

  3. Ron B

    I was not an O’bama fan and had hoped to vote for Hillary Clinton…. alas, things did not work out. I voted for Obama and, to be truthful, I feel betrayed. I feel he is doing everything possible to hold back or stop any civil rights for gay men and women.

    I feel used and will NOT vote for him again. The GOP at least say to our faces that they hate us…. no pretending.

  4. Miles

    Ron. The House passed ENDA and DADT; do you think the Republican House is going to do that?

    Yes, Obama has been a huge disappointment. The Republicans, on the other hand, think you have too many rights.

  5. Ron B

    Miles…. If Obama had wanted the done it would have happened. The man lied to get elected with things that he dangled in front of gays to get financial support…. I doubt he ever had any intention of allowing gays in the military.

    I am tired of words….. action is the only thing I believe in now days…

Leave a Reply

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

A Closer Look

Why some think the dissent cries ‘wolf’ over Supreme Court marriage decision

The U.S. Supreme Court’s June 26 decision striking down state bans against same-sex marriage has been touted as “probably the strongest manifesto in favor of marriage” and pilloried as “a threat to American democracy.” The huff and puff will soon die down, and here’s a look at the legal bricks that will remain standing and why some might think the dissent is crying “wolf.”

» more


Breaking News

“Justice that arrives like a thunderbolt”: On same-sex marriage “the fight is over”

June 26 has been solidified as the historic date for LGBT history in the United States. It is the day in 2003 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states could not enforce laws prohibiting same-sex adults from having intimate relations. It is the day in 2013 when a Supreme Court procedural ruling enabled same-sex couples to marry […]

» more


Supreme Court: States must license and recognize licenses of marriages for same-sex couples

In a widely expected yet stunning victory for LGBT people nationally, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today (June 26) that state bans on marriage for same-sex couples are unconstitutional. The decision requires states to both issue marriage licenses to couples and to recognize marriage licenses obtained in other states by same-sex couples.

» more


Supreme Court upholds health insurance subsidies critical to people with HIV

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6 to 3 decision, upheld the right of the federal government to provide health care insurance subsidies to people with low income in states that have chosen not to participate in the Affordable Care Act by setting up insurance “exchanges.”

The decision, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, is a big political victory for the Obama administration and a big relief for people with low incomes, including many people with HIV.

» more


Abercrombie case: LGBT and evangelicals on the same side

It is a rare occasion when LGBT legal activists find themselves on the same side of a case as the conservative Christian Legal Society and the National Association of Evangelicals. It is also rare to find LGBT legal activists on the same side as conservative Justice Antonin Scalia and his fondness for hewing to the original explicit language of a law.

But so it was with EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch June 1, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an employer cannot escape federal law’s requirement to accommodate a job applicant’s religious practices by claiming the applicant never told the employer about his or her religious practices.

» more


Roberts’ questions stole the spotlight; will they steal the show on marriage?

Most legal observers who watched or listened to the oral arguments from April 28 in Obergefell v. Hodges, an appeal seeking to strike down bans on same-sex marriages in four states, focused on the likelihood that Justice Anthony Kennedy will vote with the court’s four liberal wing justices and find the bans unconstitutional. But a few, like University of California School of Law Professor Erwin Chemerinsky, believe the vote could even be 6 to 3, with Chief Justice John Roberts on board.

» more