ad_facebook
ad_email_468

3 responses to “President: “Not going to make news” on marriage equality any time soon”

  1. Ted

    I’m glad the President isn’t letting himself be bullied by the gay activist agenda.

  2. Francoise

    Bullied by the activists gay agenda? Now that was a laugh that made my day! We all know who is doing the real bullying here and the real reason why Obama takes a segregationist’s classic Ronald Reagan ‘states rights’ position that is an insult to his own parents who were actually deemed criminals and whose marriage was illegal in may states such that California and Hawaii were amongst the few states in which they were safe.

    Of course the dissembling Obama speaks perfect Ketman and is smart enough to know that this is neither a matter for voters, for Congress, or any state legislature. This is a matter that can and will only be decided by SCOTUS so he’s probably smart not to enter the fray and just work to alter the high court’s composition if he can. But given the position of some current conservative justices who have ruled in our favor in the past, and considering the no-brainer legal dynamic, I really don’t think we need to fear the court – which is our best hope. As the late SCOTUS Justice Robert H. Jackson wrote,

    “The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to WITHDRAW CERTAIN SUBJECTS FROM THE VICISSITUDES OF POLITICAL CONTROVERSY, TO PLACE THEM BEYOND THE REACH OF MAJORITIES AND OFFICIALS AND TO ESTABLISH THEM AS LEGAL PRINCIPLES TO BE APPLIED BY THE COURTS. One’s right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS MAY NOT BE SUBMITTED TO VOTE; THEY DEPEND ON THE OUTCOME OF NO ELECTIONS.”

    Thanks Lisa for an excellent report. Really. Without editorializing too much I think you have made the best contribution when it comes to informing the community. Much remains to be done. The very fact that Obama can appear before an LGBT audience and so cavalierly toss over the ‘states rights’ insult and get away with it with nary a bubble of protest from the so-called “bullies’ of the “gay activist agenda” is proof positive that, not only are too many of our ‘’activists’ toothless lap dog sycophants, our own leadership has left the lay community disgracefully ignorant of the no-brainer legal dynamic at play here.

    We can understand why Obama plays this cynical game of cat and mouse but in a game of cat and mouse, it’s usually the cat that wins. Obama will do as he feels he must do, but it’s a disgrace and dis-service to the Community when journalists no only pander to the same legal ignorance but lack the guts to call this so-called ‘civil rights lawyer’ out on the most rudimentary legal rubbish. I understand that it’s a calculated PR strategy but, frankly, pandering to ignorance at the same time we fuel it is not much of a strategy. Obama claims to revere Lincoln but he is clearly more of a dissembling Jefferson whose own children were given over to the hammer of the auction block. President Obama and the LBGT leadership b ut to paraphrase Lincoln, “I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth [and educated in basic law], they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts [and educate them as to the bedrock law of our land].”

  3. Mombian » Blog Archive » Weekly Political Roundup

    [...] President Obama continued to avoid answering questions about his stance on marriage equality. [...]

Leave a Reply

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

Your support keeps us going. Thank you!

A Closer Look

Utah marriage cases cued up before the Tenth Circuit today, and next weekUtah marriage cases cued up before the Tenth Circuit today, and next week

The Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals today will become the second federal appeals court to tackle the question of whether statewide laws banning same-sex couples from marrying violate the U.S. Constitution. A three-judge panel will scrutinize the decision last December that held the state constitution’s definition of marriage as being only between “a man and a woman” is not permissible under the U.S. Constitution.

» more


Breaking News

Prop 8 book ‘Forcing the Spring’ triggers pile-on of criticism for ‘distortions’

There has been a dramatic pile-on of criticism around the release Tuesday of a new book about the legal case that challenged California’s Proposition 8. The book, Forcing the Spring, by New York Times writer Jo Becker, has been thoroughly pilloried by many plugged-in LGBT activists and journalists this week, both publicly and privately.

» more


Utah marriage cases cued up before the Tenth Circuit today, and next weekUtah marriage cases cued up before the Tenth Circuit today, and next week

The Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals today will become the second federal appeals court to tackle the question of whether statewide laws banning same-sex couples from marrying violate the U.S. Constitution. A three-judge panel will scrutinize the decision last December that held the state constitution’s definition of marriage as being only between “a man and a woman” is not permissible under the U.S. Constitution.

» more


Report urges push to get the full picture on LGBT health in CDC data sweepReport urges push to get the full picture on LGBT health in CDC data sweep

A report released March 27 by the Boston-based Fenway Institute has found important health-related risks within the LGB community that are not well-documented or well-known and not addressed by prevention and treatment programs.

» more


Supreme Court hearing on religious exemptions seems “deeply worrisome”Supreme Court hearing on religious exemptions seems “deeply worrisome”

The implications of two U.S. Supreme Court cases argued Tuesday for LGBT people and for laws that seek to prevent discrimination against LGBT people were a big part of the political discourse Tuesday afternoon. Jenny Pizer, director of Lambda Legal’s Law and Public Policy program, said her sense of how the arguments went is “deeply worrisome.”

» more


Sixth Circuit stays Michigan until Wednesday; hundreds already marriedSixth Circuit stays Michigan until Wednesday; hundreds already married

The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued a stay at 5 p.m. Saturday of a district court decision Friday that struck down Michigan’s ban on same-sex couples marrying. Meanwhile, hundreds of same-sex couples married before the stay was issued. The appeals court is expected to render its decision on the stay Wednesday.

» more